Haves and Have Less—Why Inequality Throws Us Off Balance

Jeremy CliftBy Jeremy Clift

We used to think that overall economic growth would pull everyone up. While the rich might be getting richer, everyone would benefit and would see higher living standards. That was the unspoken bargain of the market system.

But now research is showing that, in many countries, inequality is on the rise and the gap between the rich and the poor is widening, particularly over the past quarter-century.

With taxpayers footing the bill for troubles in the financial industry in advanced economies during the global economic crisis, this discrepancy seems particularly galling to wage-earners who have seen their pay stagnate or worse. Inequality has started to attract more research by economists.

The September 2011 issue of Finance & Development (F&D) looks at income inequality around the world and how it matters.

Small group of winners

The world has seen an unprecedented era of economic growth over the past decades, which has made people better off, on average. But overall the rich have done much better than the poor. According to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), growing inequality breeds social resentment and generates political instability. It also fuels populist, protectionist, and anti-globalization sentiments. “People will no longer support open trade and free markets if they feel that they are losing out while a small group of winners is getting richer and richer,” says Angel Gurría, the OECD Secretary-General.

According to Branko Milanovic, a lead economist at the World Bank who wrote the cover article, the global economic crisis may have narrowed global inequality somewhat between people around the world because most emerging and developing economies continued to maintain strong growth. Milanovic explains his research in this podcast.

Don’t brake too fast

The Painful Medicine of fiscal adjustment in some  advanced economies can add to these inequality woes. With debate on the pace of fiscal adjustment looming large in many advanced economies, the article by Laurence Ball, Daniel Leigh, and Prakash Loungani is already drawing high profile attention—including from Paul Krugman, the Washington Post, and Huffington Post—for the finding that slamming on the budget brakes too quickly will hurt incomes and job prospects.

IMF economists Andrew Berg and Jonathan Ostry—who have blogged on the topic of inequality for iMFdirect—say that inequality is counterproductive. In fact, a more equal society has a greater likelihood of sustaining longer-term growth.

F&D’s regular Picture This section provides a good snapshot of patterns of inequality over the past century , drawing on interesting results from the World Top Incomes database.

Other feature articles discuss:

*************

Finance & Development is a quarterly magazine of the IMF, publishing analysis of issues related to the international financial system, monetary policy, economic development, poverty reduction, and other world economic issues. The print and web editions are published quarterly in English, Arabic, Chinese, French, Russian, and Spanish.

For previous issues of F&D visit: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/fda.htm

Visit F&D’s Facebook page: www.facebook.com/FinanceandDevelopment

3 Responses

  1. If we can’t agree on the data and what it is showing, this thread will fizzle out in short order, but there should be enough evidence to demonstrate that in most developed economies — and in particular those of an Anglo-Saxon bent — labour’s share of income has been in secular decline over the last 30 years. It should be seen as the revenge of the wealthy and powerful for the financial repression that preceeded it for the previous 30 years.

  2. It is we the majority that keep feeding the ruling minorities! Out leaders force austerity types of measures onto their majorities of tax payers but increase the tax subsidies to their business elites. We all think that if we work hard and step on each other that somehow the ruling classes will pick you out of the crowed and ask you to join but we forget/ignore that the reason why there is the ruling classes is because we the majority are subservient to them as we live to serve by feeding them.

  3. How can inequality not increase when bank regulations built a wall that odiously and arbitrarily discriminates in favor of what is dangerously perceived as “not-risky” and against what wimpy regulators consider the dangerous “risky”.

    That wall drove the world into a crisis, by means of generating excessive bank exposures to what was ex-ante perceived as “not-risky”, and is stopping the world from getting out of the crisis, by making it harder to enlist the help of the purposeful “risky”, the small businesses and entrepreneurs.

    Therefore, for the benefit of the future, Mr. Regulator, tear down this Basel wall!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 806 other followers

%d bloggers like this: