Global Economy: Some Bad News and Some Hope

By Olivier Blanchard

(Versions in  عربي中文EspañolFrançaisРусский日本語)

The world economic recovery continues, but it has weakened further.  In advanced countries, growth is now too low to make a substantial dent in unemployment.  And in major emerging countries, growth that had been strong earlier has also decreased.

Let me give you a few numbers from our latest projections in the October World Economic Outlook released in Tokyo.

Relative to the IMF’s forecasts last April, our growth forecasts for 2013 have been revised down from 1.8%  to 1.5% for advanced countries, and from 5.8% down to 5.6% for emerging and developing countries.

The downward revisions are widespread.  They are however stronger for two sets of countries–for the members of the euro area, where we now expect growth close to zero in 2013, and for three of the large emerging market economies, ChinaIndia, and Brazil.

Familiar story

The forces at work are for the most part familiar.  Let me start with the advanced economies.

The main force pulling up growth is accommodative monetary policy.  Central banks continue not only to maintain very low policy rates, but also to experiment with programs aimed at decreasing rates in particular markets, at helping particular categories of borrowers, or at helping financial intermediation in general.

But two forces continue to pull growth down—fiscal consolidation, and a still weak financial system.

In most countries, fiscal consolidation is proceeding according to plan.  While this consolidation is needed, there is no question that it is weighing on demand, and the evidence increasingly suggests that, in the current environment, the fiscal multipliers are large—larger than in normal times.

The financial system is still not functioning efficiently.   In many countries, more so in Europe than in the United States, banks are still weak, and their position is made worse by low growth.  As a result, many borrowers still face tight borrowing conditions.

And more seems to be at work than these mechanical forces, call it a general feeling of uncertainty about the future.  Worries about the ability of European policymakers to control the euro crisis, worries about the failure of U.S. policymakers to agree so far on a fiscal plan, worries about the ability of Japanese policymakers to reduce their budget deficit further–all appear to play an important role, although one which is hard to nail down.

Let me turn to emerging market and developing economies.

A constant theme of our IMF forecasts has been the degree to which the world economy is interconnected, be it through trade or through capital flows.  And this time is no exception.

Low growth in advanced countries is affecting emerging and developing economies through exports.  As was the case in 2009, trade channels are surprisingly strong, with, for example, lower exports accounting for most of the decrease in growth in China, and through supply chains, much of the decrease in growth in Asia.

Alternative risk-off and risk-on episodes, triggered by progress and regress on policy actions, are triggering volatile capital flows, in particular to Asia and to Latin America.

Adding to these are some home grown woes, policy uncertainty in India affecting domestic demand, tighter policies in Brazil in response to an earlier boom.

We do not see these developments as signs of a hard landing in any of these countries.  Indeed, we see positive policy measures being taken in all three countries.   But they suggest lower growth for some time, lower than we have seen in the recent past.

What should be done? 

The general strategy is clear.  Continue with accommodating monetary policy, which is a very powerful force for growth, and limit the adverse effects of the brakes holding things back. Continue with steady fiscal consolidation; our advice still holds: not too slow, not too fast.   Continue to repair the financial system.   Decrease policy uncertainty.   In other words, deliver fiscal consolidation and maintain growth.

In the short run however, the main issue continues the state of the euro area, and this is what I shall concentrate my remaining remarks on.

Over the past few months, it is clear that there has been an important change in attitudes in the euro area, and the realization that an ambitious architecture must be put in place.

The lessons of the past few years are now clear:  euro area countries can be hit by strong shocks.  Weak banks can considerably amplify the adverse effects of these shocks.  And, if it looks like the sovereign itself might be in trouble, sovereign/bank interactions can further worsen the outcome.

Thus a new architecture must aim at reducing the amplitude of the shocks in the first place; at putting in place a system of transfers to soften the effects of the shocks.  It must aim at moving the supervision, the resolution, the recapitalization process of banks to the euro level.

It is good to see these issues being seriously explored, and some of these mechanisms being put together. In the short term however, more immediate measures are needed.

Spain and Italy must follow through with adjustment plans which reestablish competitiveness and fiscal balance, and maintain growth.   To do so, they must be able to recapitalize their banks, if needed, without adding to their sovereign debt.   And they must be able to borrow at reasonable rates.   Most of these pieces are in the process of falling into in place, and if the complex puzzle can be rapidly completed, one can reasonably hope that the worst might be behind us.

If uncertainty is indeed partly behind the current slowdown, and if the adoption and implementation of these measures decrease it, things may turn out better than our forecasts, not only in Europe, but also in the rest of the world.  The case for an upside scenario is a bit stronger than it has been for a while.

7 Responses

  1. [...] equal to .5 when current revisions have them more at 1.8! No wonder Olivier Blanchard adds a touchy-feely twist to the IMF’s latest World Economic Outlook. After sinking an already ailing Greek [...]

  2. [...] Blanchard nicely summarizes the October edition of IMF’s World Economic Outlook and makes you feel like you’ve [...]

  3. I think dividing the Eurozone into smaller manageable pieces is a good solution so the better economies are not dragged down by other struggling ones, but then it kills the purpose of the entire “European Union”.

  4. [...] By Olivier Blanchard The world economic recovery continues, but it has weakened further.  In advanced countries, growth is now too low to make a substantial dent in unemployment.  And in major emerging countries, growth that had been strong earlier…  [...]

  5. Fiscal consolidation — not too slow and not two fast — a relevant piece of advice by Olivier to have normal growth and to avoid a hard landing.

    Concerning the Eurozone (since this zone is under maximum pressure), instead of insisting upon one currency union or one liability union this zone should be segregated into three to four manageable units having the following characteristics:- earmarking of countries having closer geographical contiguity with various sizes of economies; opportunities for the development of the individual currencies along with the main unit currency; minimal tariff and non tariff barriers among unit states by allowing free flow of goods and services; autonomous central banks for effective implementation of monetary and macroeconomic policies; and independent stocks exchanges for equities business. Welding of 17 countries in one lump is not going to be a lasting solution for the economic woes of Europe. Division of labor leads to improvement in productivity. Why should they expect frequent bail-outs from Germany and France or other financial institutions and for how long?

    As regards other emerging/developing and LIC countries, resilience has been confirmed by the IMF in their recent publication of the WEO, but the downward trends in the developed countries can also adversely affect this resilience. Consequently much more attention needs to be given to the developed countries specifically those which now form the Eurozone.

  6. [...] Global Economy: Some Bad News and Some Hope – Olivier Blanchard [...]

  7. Where is the hope? That the economic downfall might not get as bad as predicted? Then let us predict even worse downfalls, so that we can have even greater hopes.

    At this time, in these days of almost non-existent bank capital, those perceived as “risky”, like the small businesses and entrepreneurs, and for which any bank lending requires many times more bank capital than the lending to the “not-risky”, are literally being slaughtered in terms of competitive access to bank credit.

    And yet you in the IMF keep scratching your heads, in terms of why the anemic economic growth rates?

    Let me try to explain it again to you. “Risky” equals muscles, proteins, flexibility, possibilities of sturdy growth, while “not risky” equals flabbiness, carbs, fat, fragility, certainty of going down.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 802 other followers

%d bloggers like this: