Posted on May 9, 2011 by iMFdirect
By Dominique Desruelle and Catherine Pattillo
(Versions in 中文, Português, Español, Русский)
The so-called BRIC nations—Brazil, Russia, India and China—could be a game changer for how low-income countries build their economic futures.
The growing economic and financial reach of the BRICs has seen them become a new source of growth for low-income countries (LICs).
LIC-BRIC ties—particularly trade, investment and development financing—have surged over the past decade. And the relationship could take on even more prominence after the global financial crisis, with stronger growth in the BRICs and their demand for LIC exports helping to buffer against sluggish demand in most advanced economies.
The potential benefits from LIC-BRIC ties are enormous.
But, so too are challenges and risks that must be managed if the LIC-BRIC relationship to support durable and balanced growth in LICs. Continue reading
Filed under: Emerging Markets, growth, International Monetary Fund, Low-income countries | Tagged: balanced and sustainable growth, Brazil, BRICs, China, commercial financing, commodity trap, concessional lending, development financing, government debt, growth drivers, India, infrastructure development, investment, investment financing, macroeconomic stability, manufacturing, Russia, structural changes, tax incentives, trade, trade preferences, transparency | 5 Comments »
Posted on March 25, 2011 by iMFdirect
Guest post by Michael Spence, New York University,
Professor Emeritus Stanford University, and
co-host of the Conference on Macro and Growth Policies in the Wake of the Crisis
It was a privilege to participate in the IMF conference devoted to rethinking policy frameworks in the wake of the crisis. Highly encouraging was the openness of the discussion, the range of views, the willingness to question orthodoxy, and the posture of humility.
One gets the impression that the crisis has triggered a response that it should trigger, and we have embarked on a path of rethinking conceptual frameworks and policy choices in a way that will contribute to the stability of the system.
That said, the good news is that we recognize that in finance and parts of macroeconomics the models or frameworks are incomplete. That represents a challenge to the academic community. But it also means that, in the short run, participants and regulators will be operating with incomplete models. This will require judgments (which will be uncomfortable in contrast to the earlier sense of certainty). There will be mistakes. And, as Olivier Blanchard said in his excellent summary, we will proceed step-by-step, evaluating the impacts of policy choices and sometimes reversing course. Continue reading
Filed under: Economic Crisis, Economic research, International Monetary Fund | Tagged: Financial regulation, financial risk, financial stability, financial system, high-frequency trading, leverage, macroeconomic frameworks, macroeconomic models, macroeconomic stability, policy instruments, policy targets, structural changes | 10 Comments »