By Benedict Clements, Sanjeev Gupta, and Masahiro Nozaki
(Versions in 中文, Français, 日本語, Русский, and Español)
Improvements in health can have a tremendously positive effect on society’s well-being and the level of economic activity. Indeed, 2013’s path-breaking report by the Lancet Commission indicates that about 11 percent of the economic growth in recent decades can be attributed to these improvements. As such, it makes good sense for macroeconomists to pay attention to health indicators and to the factors that influence them, such as public health spending.
In this context, it is not surprising that the impact of IMF-supported programs on public health spending has generated considerable attention. Previous research, focusing on periods before the global financial crisis, indicates that Fund-supported programs have a positive effect on public health spending (Martin and Segura, 2004; Center for Global Development, 2007; Clements, Gupta and Nozaki, 2013). But does this pattern still hold if we extend the analysis to more recent years? In this blog, we take a fresh look at this evidence for developing economies.
Filed under: Africa, Economic Crisis, Economic research, Financial Crisis, Fiscal policy, Global Governance, Globalization, Government, growth, IMF, International Monetary Fund, Low-income countries, Multilateral Cooperation, Politics, Reform | Tagged: Africa, ebola, health care, health spending, Liberia, public health spending, Sierra Leone, Sub-Saharan Africa, tax reform | Leave a comment »